Apple TV+ Just Quietly Upgraded Its Most Underrated War Epic

Comments

• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Napoleon.

  source

  • reddig33@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Not really underrated. More like “panned”.

    source
• Infynis@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  This community doesn’t require the post title to be the same as the article title, not even for bots. Why would you leave it as clickbait?

  source

  • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I’m used to posting in a community that does. The inline headline is better:

    Is Napoleon: Director’s Cut Worth Watching? Ridley Scott Fans Already Know the Answer

    I’ll see if I can put it in this post, and either avoid Inverse (their titles are always like this) or alter the titles moving forward.

    source
• koncertejo@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I think the fundamental themes of the film were at odds with a compelling and historically relevant telling of the story of Napoleon. Mostly mindless repetition of two centuries-old British propaganda. I don’t see how an alternate cut could address the flawed approach this film had.

  source
• maegul@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I didn’t know Scott teased about the directors cut, but watching it I could quickly tell there would be one and Scott also knew there’d be one while he was editing the main release. The feel of the film had a “fine, well cut it short“ vibe all over it.

  source