‘Not too complex’: health experts criticise Labor for ditching LGBTQI+ census questions

Comments

• Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m confused. I thought the end result last week was that they would include the questions. But now they’re again saying it’s too hard?

  source

  • zero_gravitas@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    While the government has said there will be a question on sexual orientation, it has not reversed the decision to cancel work on the other questions which would give a baseline on the number of trans, gender diverse and people with variations of sex characteristics.

    I hadn’t realised this. It was reported everywhere just as the decision to cut questions having been reversed, not partially reversed.

    source

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      @Zagorath@aussie.zone Albanese tried to weasel his way out of it by suggesting there will be one new question (relating to sexuality I think) and that existing census contained questions which could be updated.

      source
• threeduck@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I dunno, I’m kinda of two minds. On one hand, it’s definitely good to know the breadth of the LGBT+ community, for further policy decisions and what have you - ALL info is good info.

  On the other hand, what business does the government have knowing what I do in the privacy of my bedroom? Aside from the legal aspects of sexuality which I believe are fairly equal now (marriage laws, adoption laws etc), why do they wanna know who I’m blasting nuts into?

  source