Currently chromium 128, and Firefox 127. They always seem to go shoulder to shoulder.
Nope. Bill Gates made it that way so edge would be different.
Submitted 10 months ago by BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Currently chromium 128, and Firefox 127. They always seem to go shoulder to shoulder.
Nope. Bill Gates made it that way so edge would be different.
… What?
Lemminary@lemmy.world 10 months ago
No, it’s a PR move. Why would anyone use Firefox 12.0 when Chrome is so obviously more advanced with a fast release cycle sitting at version 120+?
radix@lemmy.world 10 months ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_version_history
Firefox 1.0 was in 2004, and it took until March 2011 to get to version 4.0. Then by the end of 2011, they were on version 9.
Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Let’s use hash value for versioning. Big numbers go bigger! Joking aside, I totally believe that there are people who would think bigger numbers means more advanced, and it’s depressing.
hushable@lemmy.world 10 months ago
that’s the reason why we got Xbox 360 instead of Xbox 2
DarkThoughts@fedia.io 10 months ago
I still despise Mozilla for changing the version numbering. It's so fucking stupid. 90% of the "major updates" are just minor shit while the minor updates are just tiny bug & security fixes. But I guess when you plan to not really move the browser forward, then you wouldn't have gotten any real major updates anyway.
T156@lemmy.world 10 months ago
One of the reasons why the 1/3rd pound burger lost to the 1/4 pound burger, was because people saw the 1/4, and thought that the quarter-pound was larger for some inexplicable reason.