Currently chromium 128, and Firefox 127. They always seem to go shoulder to shoulder.
Nope. Bill Gates made it that way so edge would be different.
Is it just a coincidence that Chromium and Firefox have similar version numbers?
Submitted 9 months ago by BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 months ago
No, it’s a PR move. Why would anyone use Firefox 12.0 when Chrome is so obviously more advanced with a fast release cycle sitting at version 120+?
radix@lemmy.world 9 months ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_version_history
Firefox 1.0 was in 2004, and it took until March 2011 to get to version 4.0. Then by the end of 2011, they were on version 9.
Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
Let’s use hash value for versioning. Big numbers go bigger! Joking aside, I totally believe that there are people who would think bigger numbers means more advanced, and it’s depressing.
hushable@lemmy.world 9 months ago
that’s the reason why we got Xbox 360 instead of Xbox 2
DarkThoughts@fedia.io 9 months ago
I still despise Mozilla for changing the version numbering. It's so fucking stupid. 90% of the "major updates" are just minor shit while the minor updates are just tiny bug & security fixes. But I guess when you plan to not really move the browser forward, then you wouldn't have gotten any real major updates anyway.
T156@lemmy.world 9 months ago
One of the reasons why the 1/3rd pound burger lost to the 1/4 pound burger, was because people saw the 1/4, and thought that the quarter-pound was larger for some inexplicable reason.