The fact that nature just overwhelms us with its complexity and may never be fully understood makes me kind of sad but very happy at the same time
Full Lives
Submitted 5 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/77755572-d3b9-4c5b-b18d-efde7c78d313.jpeg
Comments
MarcomachtKuchen@feddit.de 5 months ago
PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Take solace in the fact that you are part of said nature :)
HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Anyone else just find out they are a fruit fly?
moistclump@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I love how much we don’t know. It’s wonderful. It’s exciting. Frontiers all over the place.
PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Ive not taken the time to verify any of the information in this post, but lets assume for the moment that good science has been done and these claims are legit. Lets also take consider other similar research that has been done in the arena of plant and animal “awareness”. Are we approaching a point in the scientific community where some level of awareness ahould be assumed for creatures beyond ourselves? It seems that every time we look close enough at a product of nature (fungus, plants, etc) we discover some new element of what we would call “awareness”. Hell, I’ve even seen claims that certain plants can be anesthetized, with drugs that work on humans no less.
Say that we discovered life as we know it on another planet, and what that would do to our perception of “life” throughout the universe. Once could be a fluke, twice could be a coincidence, but given the scale of our universe if we were to find any life, in our own galaxy especially, it would drastically change our perception of the rarity of life.
Now, consider that we have primate relatives who show many of the some properties of awareness that we do, and the pile of other research pointing to varying levels of “awareness” for virtually everything we look at, including creatures such as planta and fungi. How this hasn’t led to a general acceptance that every “living” thing likely has a subjective experience is a bit beyond me, but I also am not a trained scientist, so maybe someone here can shed some light.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 5 months ago
PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Neat!
Hawanja@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Bogleech is an awesome artist and illustrator btw.
plinky@hexbear.net 5 months ago
perishthethought@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Sir Terry Pratchett, I assume?
Good stuff, regardless.