For anyone who didn’t read it.
The article is about him claiming that the judge is a tyrant for threatening to exclude testimony, not actually doing so. There are some vague references to the judge being “unfair” about what evidence it allowed from the prosecution vs the defense, but no concrete examples given. Then some whining about “fake news.” That’s it. That’s the whole thing. He was shocked by nothing actually happening, and then some vague
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
The media lies in their reporting, but not me! I’m telling the truth!
The jury is anonymous and has been told not to reveal their identities because they could be put into danger by Trump fanatics. Trials don’t need vigilante justice. The trial already has a jury and a judge. They are the deciders of the outcome. If trump doesnt like the outcome he can appeal to different judges who will review to see if errors in process and judgment were made. That’s how the law works. Trump doesn’t get special rules.