cross-posted from: slrpnk.net/post/9098044
(9000 / 6,000,000,000) *100 (most recent estimate according to DJT stock market valuation. Take it with a sack of salt) = 0.00015%
System is working just as designed.
Submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
cross-posted from: slrpnk.net/post/9098044
(9000 / 6,000,000,000) *100 (most recent estimate according to DJT stock market valuation. Take it with a sack of salt) = 0.00015%
System is working just as designed.
Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 months ago
Is that a typical amount for anyone who might do similar? It sure doesn't seem like a lot, especially for someone that is known to push law boundaries.
Lmaydev@programming.dev 10 months ago
Basically total bullshit. He should be locked up for how much he’s done it. Anyone else would be.
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Pretty sure being held in contempt also violates the conditions of his pre-trial release, so… Yeah.
PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The judge is being very careful to not give even the impression that he’s not treating Trump fairly so that Trump has little to nothing to appeal.
He did warn Trump that further violations would result in jail time. I’ll believe that when I see it, but it’s not like the judge could go straight to imprisonment.
silence7@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
It’s the maximum fine for contempt. Judge needs to impose a day or two in jail to actually get through to Trump
The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 10 months ago
I actually don’t mind the total, just keep fining him, 1k at a time, because the absolute pettiness of it probably irritates the fuck out of him.
“Small” amounts of cash really piss off people with money because it is more “real”. If you take someone like him and charge him 50k he wilñ fight it tooth and nail and then have his accountants find a way to siphon it off something else and he’s not affected…really.
But 1k? dude has to write a fucking check and that’s probably eating him up.