Comment on Video Games Can’t Afford to Look This Good

makyo@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• TheV2@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Well, everyone has their priorities. The problem is that even the people, who do value realistic graphics the most, are not captured by new AAA games.

  source
• teslasaur@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Story goes somewhere below Replay value, and controls go to number one. Gameplay and controls are pretty much interchangable unless you want a cinema simulator.

  Add sound design as number two above music as number three and then the list is done.

  source

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Disagree, story is definitely more important than replayability for me.

    source

    • teslasaur@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      All the time i spent playing Dota, Starcraft, battlefield and smash melee says nope. But to even have replayability as a category is pretty pointless.

      All other factors lead to replayability if you go by the order I suggested. Having a set story limits replayability so that tracks.

      source

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        All the time i spent playing Dota, Starcraft, battlefield and smash melee says nope.

        Sure, if your metric is hours of gameplay per dollar spent. But that’s no way to rate a video game if you ask me.

        For instance I would rate The Talos Principle or Disco Elysium as much better games than, say, World of Warcraft, despite the fact that I played wow much more than the former two. But the story of those two games are just far more interesting and the games have left a much more impactful, lasting impression on me even though I don’t play them any more.

        source
• 7dev7random7@suppo.fi ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  • FPS

  source