Comment on DNA
peanutyam@lemmy.world 4 weeks agoWell then use this as a teaching moment and elaborate then?
I live in a country that uses the King’s English, not the American version so please enlighten me - I do enjoy learning.
But don’t say there are an amount of errors without even trying to quantify them….given the burden of proof rests with you.
victorz@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Fair enough, let’s have at it, Mr. “King’s English”. (God, do you even hear how insufferably pretentious that sounds?)
Let’s start with the original comment. My edits in [brackets].
Next comment!
Did you learn something?
psud@aussie.zone 4 weeks ago
That clause was fine up to the missing commas. He’s pointing at the phrase and saying that’s irony right there. Perhaps you’re unfamiliar with that structure. I don’t think it’s common in all Englishes
That’s pedantic. Nearly no one uses en and em dashes; if they’re typing on a physical keyboard those dashes are hard to type
victorz@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I am, but it’s grammatically insufficient. Idiomatically/colloquially/slang wise, it’s fine. I understood enough to know what they mean, obviously.
Of course it’s pedantic. I’m going out of my way to be pedantic to show this grammar snob what it feels like to throw the first stone.
Skill issue. If they care enough, it’s easy to find out how. 🤷♂️ I use them all the time.
Thanks for joining the fun!
stephen01king@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Isn’t the first mistake simply him using the sentence to declare there is irony? How is that an incomplete sentence?
victorz@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Could you clarify? Do you mean to say it’s incomplete or actually complete?
stephen01king@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
I meant to say that part is already a complete sentence.