Comment on nuclear

TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• BastingChemina@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  1000043765

  source

  • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Yeah, but keep in mind that nuclear waste has some time left to do damage. It’s not like a hydro plant is going to come back and haunt you in a 100 years from now. That’s what worries me with nuclear, aside from the fact that it’s too slow to build to be a solution to the climate crisis.

    Solar, wind and hydro should be top priority in my opinion.

    source

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It’s not like a hydro plant is going to come back and haunt you in a 100 years from now.

      the ecological impact of it, probably will. But that depends on whether you consider altering the ecological environment a “bad” thing or not.

      source

      • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        That is a good point, it probably will, and I do consider it bad.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• _stranger_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Oxygen is bad for us, but it’s a lot better than the alternative.

  source
• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  fukushima was entirely a skill issue, just don’t

  TMI was entirely a skill issue

  chernobyl was a bad design, and a skill issue, plus a few other skill issues.

  the runit dome was from atomic bomb testing right? Not even real nuclear power, it may have been a fission bomb, but i’m not looking into it far enough. Weird that you don’t mention nagasaki or hiroshima in that list.

  the hanford site, i’m not familiar with, but im guessing this is a development plant? And probably just procedural skill issues? There have been a number of smaller accidents, most of which are due to people being stupid.

  source