Ngl if I didn’t have impact drivers I’d probably hate Phillips screws a whole lot more
Comment on The torque better not be too strong with this one
Pothetato@lemmy.world 6 days agoIn my experience, Phillips heads strip more often than Robertson.
SirSamuel@lemmy.world 6 days ago
azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
Torx > Hex > Robertson > Pozidriv > Phillips > Slot.
This is not (just) the ramblings of a mad nerd, but objective fact derived from contact area between screwdriver and screw.
In practice hex does have one situational advantage over Torx, namely that they are almost always tightened with Allen keys which are more torque-y and can be used in tight spaces. For every other application Torx wins. Every other head type is strictly inferior and only exists for legacy or penny-saving reasons.
marcos@lemmy.world 6 days ago
What they don’t say is that the smaller the features on the contact, the easier it is to strip them. This almost reverses the order on your post depending on the way you tighten the screw.
azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 6 days ago
For hex yes, for Torx no. Your smartphone’s itty bitty screws are quite possibly T4 or similar.
marcos@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Torx is more resilient to over-torsion than Hex, but both of them will end near the end of the list on that one metric, with slot first, and way ahead of anything else.
Despite what the Torx publicity says, engineering is done over a multitude of dimensions, and that one dimension Torx wins may not be nearly as important as some other random one.