Comment on one heckin' huge fish
terminally_offline@infosec.pub 1 week agoElusive*, you’ll probably try to correct me and say that you meant “illusive” but that’s not the right use-case for it anyway.
Comment on one heckin' huge fish
terminally_offline@infosec.pub 1 week agoElusive*, you’ll probably try to correct me and say that you meant “illusive” but that’s not the right use-case for it anyway.
very_well_lost@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Here we see the illusive pedant in its natural habitat
psud@aussie.zone 1 week ago
It’s not pedantry to point out your word choice was so completely wrong. Illusive is descriptive of things that are illusions (a mirage is illusive water); elusive is descriptive of something that is hard to find
my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 1 week ago
“Correcting” someone in a casual setting when they clearly communicated their ideas in a way that was understood by the majority of the audience without issue is pedantry, or more specifically linguistic prescriptivism. If their meaning was unclear you’d ask what they meant to say, when you tell someone what they meant to say you obviously understood them and are just being pedantic.
onwardknave@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
This is the internet, and I welcome such pedantry.
terminally_offline@infosec.pub 1 week ago
Ignoramus will be an ignoramus.
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 days ago
ignore anus? man i try to