Comment on Charities of Employees from "non-profit" I was going to donate too
chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 months ago
You earn less than 20k? Save your money, volunteer your time! Much more productive and rewarding!
Comment on Charities of Employees from "non-profit" I was going to donate too
chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 months ago
You earn less than 20k? Save your money, volunteer your time! Much more productive and rewarding!
FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
Disabled and bedridden, can’t volunteer. All I got is my disability insurance payments and I want to do good in the world.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 months ago
www.hotosm.org
If you would like to do something cool, I suggest these guys. You can do it all from wherever you are comfortable.
FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
Already chose a charity. But cheers. This year I’m aiding aussie wildlife :)
fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 months ago
This is ongoing work that is also free training, they need labour more than money. :) But, hell yea. They’re a great org.
Cyclist@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Executive pay is to high Inn the US. But consider this: ted.com/…/dan_pallotta_the_way_we_think_about_cha…
Who do you want running the zoo?
Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
I want someone who would choose to spend a million/year on the animals instead of on themselves.
That video is garbage, you REALLY think the “best and brightest” are the ones making millions? It’s the well connected. The people who make and break lives like chips on a poker table over a game of golf. The people who hang out on Epstein’s Island. They’re the only ones making millions per year.
The best and brightest are slaving away in universities and companies making meager salaries. The ones who have to fight for every cent that goes towards their innovation and research, who have to convince shareholders that every dollar they invest will give them a thousand back.
Let those people run the zoo, they’ll do it for 120k. That’s millions more that can be spent on the animals by people who actually have the skills to help.
Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
I want the Steve Irwins of the world that would only pursue the money in the benefit of the animals, not of their own pockets to run the zoo. Most productive and valuable people are not the richest but those truelly passionate that would even do it for free if it would’t ruin their lifes.
MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 months ago
No doubt that Steve Irwin was a good person, but I’d like to say that his personal net worth was $10 million at the time of his unfortunate death. Thinking of this though, that money is probably what allowed his children to study and pursue lives of work for the good of the world. At the end of the day that we can say about Steve is that he died how he lived, with an animal in his heart.