Comment on Stat of the day

Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• weker01@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  No the transparency effect means at least vista.

  source

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    For whatever reason I always forget about vista.

    source

    • problematicPanther@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      in fairness, it was a completely forgettable os

      source

      • dan@upvote.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Vista brought a lot of good features and improvements, but it required very high specced systems and ran like garbage on the lower-end systems that were common at the time. It tried to make too many changes too quickly.

        It also had a bunch of driver issues, because it introduced new driver models that were more reliable/stable, some of which are still used today, like WDDM (Windows Display Driver Model) for display drivers. This required manufacturers to make some big changes to their drivers, and not all manufacturers are great at writing drivers.

        So yeah it was kinda terrible at the time, but it laid a mostly solid foundation to build on top of. By the time Windows 7 came out, PCs had better specs, and manufacturers had fixed all the issues with their new drivers. Windows 7 was good because of Vista, not in spite of it.

        source
      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I had Windows ME, so vista wasn’t really one I used until later because of that. I think I eventually switched and then 7 came out. Either that or my dad had Vista.

        source
    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Had to gave Vista in order for windows 7 to be good. Microsoft can’t have two in a row be good. XP good, ME bad, win 7 good, win 8 bad, win 10 good, win 11 bad.

      source
• WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Looks like 7.

  source