Comment on Open source community figures out problems with performance in Starfield

• all-knight-party@kbin.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It boggles my mind how many things people say about this game that are patently untrue, obviously extremely biased against the game/studio, or make it seem like this game killed their dog.

  The game has issues, for sure, some things like the nonexistent city/building local map systems are indefensible, but damn dude, I wish people would just try to have mature discussions with realistic expectations about it instead of whatever this shit show is that we call "gaming discussions"

  source

  • Cypher@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    For $120 AUD expectations will be high.

    source

    • all-knight-party@kbin.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Sure, if the game doesn't appeal to you for that value, then there will be eventual sales. It won't be worth that amount to everyone. Doesn't really excuse the overly emotional criticism, or even the overly emotional defense from others. It's a good game. A true value judgment from there will be harder and more tied to individual tastes.

      source
  • Virkkunen@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Gamers will never be mature or have realistic expectations. They cannot fathom that people are enjoying a thing they don't like, and they're very vocal about it, it's petty, really.

    I try to move myself off of these discussions but there's always one comment that drags me down the well because it's so blatantly untrue, but it's miserable. Lemmy, kbin and Reddit are overly negative places where it seems the goal is to get everyone mad with terrible takes.

    People need to remember that opinions aren't factsz and learn to shut the fuck up and let people enjoy things.

    source

    • stonedemoman@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Gamers will never be mature or have realistic expectations. They cannot fathom that people are enjoying a thing they don’t like, and they’re very vocal about it, it’s petty, really.

      You claim that people need to be more mature and then disavow any nuance in the same breath. Do you not see how this is a contradiction?

      source
• TheOnlyMego@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Oh don’t get me wrong, Bethesda games are generally great (with notable exceptions like Fallout 76), and do phenomenally well in sales. However, dismissing any and all criticism of the games’ numerous flaws (including glitches which often carry over between subsequent titles, like clipping through collision boxes and falling through maps) is willful ignorance at its finest. Every Bethesda game has performance issues and game-breaking bugs, and there was no reason to expect Starfield to be any different in that regard.

  source

  • SwampYankee@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    clipping through collision boxes and falling through maps

    These are famously common bugs across games in all genres running on all kinds of different engines. I’d go so far as to not even call them bugs because computers simply don’t have the power to calculate collision down to the picosecond/picometer. Every game that’s ever been made has sacrificed precision in physics for performance.

    Perhaps the reason it’s more noticeable in Bethesda games is because they typically have way more persistent, physics-enabled objects. That’s actually a strength of the engine, and something no other developer really even attempts.

    source

    • TheOnlyMego@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      These are famously common bugs across games in all genres running on all kinds of different engines.

      Correct, but we aren’t talking about them. Whataboutism isn’t constructive.

      I’d go so far as to not even call them bugs because computers simply don’t have the power to calculate collision down to the picosecond/picometer.

      Actually, a large proportion of OoB clips in games are due to some combination of lacking speed caps and having acute angles in collision boxes.

      Every game that’s ever been made has sacrificed precision in physics for performance.

      Correct, and I’m not disputing this.

      Perhaps the reason it’s more noticeable in Bethesda games is because they typically have way more persistent, physics-enabled objects.

      This definitely contributes to the issues common in Bethesda games, but it’s not the only reason. Take Skyrim for example: some of its best-known glitches (such as restoration bonuses buffing enchantments, the various duplication glitches, and basically everything involving horses) have nothing to do with the number of dynamic objects loaded.

      That’s actually a strength of the engine, and something no other developer really even attempts.

      Not really - plenty of other games use Havok physics and don’t suffer from the same issues, or at least not to the same degree. Perhaps there’s a reason other developers using the Havok physics engine don’t make games with huge quantities of dynamic objects loaded at once.

      source

      • SwampYankee@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Correct, but we aren’t talking about them.

        Uh… you were talking about them. Those are the two examples of bugs that you provided. I literally wouldn’t have made the comment if you hadn’t brought them up.

        such as restoration bonuses buffing enchantments, the various duplication glitches, and basically everything involving horses

        Like if you had said these originally, I wouldn’t have even argued with you. I never personally experienced those bugs, probably because I don’t play games like I’m a QA tester, but I know many people did.

        Not really - plenty of other games use Havok physics and don’t suffer from the same issues, or at least not to the same degree. Perhaps there’s a reason other developers using the Havok physics engine don’t make games with huge quantities of dynamic objects loaded at once.

        I’ve definitely fallen through the world in several of the games listed there. But anyway, specifically, I said persistent physics objects. You can drop a cabbage in Whiterun, walk to Solitude and back, and the cabbage is right where you left it. In, say, GTA, you get out of your car and look away for 5 seconds, turn around, and it’s gone. Most games work more like GTA, where a limited number of objects even have full physics simulation, and those that do are only in memory if you’ve looked at them in the last x seconds. Otherwise, they unload and are lost forever.

        Now, whether it’s even worth having so much physics-enabled clutter is another question. It certainly contributes to immersion, but is it more trouble than it’s worth?

        source