Comment

Comment on Is air conditioning making cities hotter?

No engineer but technically adept. A computer consumes roughly 500W (some do more) of electricity which is mostly converted to heat while the work is done. This heat is then dissipated over the heatspreader/s and dumped into the room air.

A one apartment air conditioner can easily use 2kw to work or more (which is also converted into heat) plus it also pulls 10 degrees celsius (35 to 25 c for example) out of the apartments air and dumps it into the open. That means a continoous stream of hot air while the device is working.

As I said, no engineer and it is 6 am so excuse the missing numbers. The formula would be amount of energy pulled out of the air plus working energy times devices in a city. Then you have the wattage of dumped heat just for the air conditioning of said city.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
Ok that’s very helpful. So are AC units the biggest offender ? Depending on their power and efficiency?

source
- Haui@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
  I would be hardly a qualified person to tell you if they are the biggest offenders but I think it makes sense to ask this question. If they have a significant impact on temps worldwide or citywide.
  
  source
  - Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
    I’m guessing they are if they use power to cool and pull out hot air as well. No other appliances really move heated air around. Except fridges and freezers.
    
    source
mvirts@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
All power ends up as heat. Blender: electric -> kinetic -> heat. Toaster: electric-> heat. Computer: see toaster. Hydropower storage pump: heat + potential now -> heat + electricity later. Chemical battery: heat + potential now -> heat+ electricity later. Whatever work gets done electrically or otherwise, the result of that work eventually dissipates its excess energy as heat. How much energy is required to drive 2000 miles at 60 mph? Ideally the same as driving 20 miles at 60 mph, the difference is lost to heat in the air, tires, road, engine components.

Not to mention the power grid bleeds heat as well, a lot of it.

Air conditioners are just icing on the cake because they extract heat from tiny boxes and boot it out into the environment, burning excess power in the process. Heat pumps are a miracle of thermodynamics that actually use less power than the heat they add to a tiny box. Heat pumps cool the city, air conditioners heat it up. Both do work that evaporates almost immediately after it is done, so they have to always run.

Basically the hobbits had it right all along, just build a few feet underground and you’re good

source
- Haui@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
  Thanks for this elaborate explanation. It was fun to read. :)
  
  source
- Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
  So AC is bad but heat pumps are better ? Can waste heat be used for something else ? Heating greenhouses ? Pumped into water to dissipate the excess heat or used to create steam for turbines ?
  
  Any other good use for excess heat ?
  
  source
  - mvirts@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
    Yes! There are plenty of uses for excess heat, especially if you like having hot water on tap, but it’s really difficult to capture or store waste heat, mostly because if the heat is available where it is needed, like the heater of a car in a cool day, it’s not waste heat at all. There is a point where the difference in temperature between the waste heat source and the environment is large enough that it could be used to create electricity, but usually it’s not worthwhile and the equipment needed would would be better used with a dedicated heat source or not at all. I dream of a day when we develop ways to harvest energy from heat more efficiently and can use waste heat for power.
    
    source
    Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨years⁩ ago
    Well it sounds like it’s either we hear the environment or spend lots on capturing that waste heat
    
    source
    -> View More Comments