I mean, if they can somehow come up with something better than activitypub, that would be great, from what I read it’s actually not that efficient. But yeah, decentralisation is not something you can just tack on, so I’m sceptical too, especially since they’re trying to raise VC money, which is not something you do when you want to build an open protocol.
Comment on The Right Has a Bluesky Problem
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month agoEven if bluesky somehow finishes decentralization its still fundamentally incompatible with the fediverse. In addition I doubt that itll become truly open source.
jonne@infosec.pub 1 month ago
Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Decentralization is inherently inefficient. Efficiency is a double-edged sword, though. One which our modern, business focused culture actively tries to ignore the self-facing blade of.
MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Bluesky will never be fully decentralized. The DID needs a central authority like DNS. Its architecture is distributed though.
Ideally the DID stuff is put into a foundation, and once the open source the other components anyone who can handle the fire hose can join.
aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 1 month ago
unless i’m missing something, activitypub also needs a centralized authority like dns. That’s just how domain names work
Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
“Like DNS” there is an analogy. And DNS is actually a distributed system.
Imagine if every web DNS had to go through Facebook. That’s how all of the ATproto traffic works. It’s all funneled through Bluesky’s servers.
aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Not strictly speaking. The protocol supports did:web as well as did:plc