Comment on Anon preps for a hurricane

• valentinesmith@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Maybe, but they could’ve also posted the same request for citations on the first poster but did not.

  I think that really does reflect how someone can just say whatever and when challenged we are biased to only assume the second opinion as doubtful.

  source

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    OP’s claims of “oh mer gerhd you dead soon” were so broad and so wild that they didn’t seemed rooted in research. Asking for citations would be like asking your antivax aunt for her DIY “research”. But at least the claims should motivate people to seek healthcare, if they get knocked unconscious. Something that will save lives. So I left it at that.

    I asked for citations where I did, because it seemed like that commenter worked in the medical field, and actually could have the studies handy.

    If you read my request as casting doubt, then I invite you to read the first paragraph again. I specifically pointed out I just like scientific research, data, and evidence. I actually tried to avoid being seen as arguing against the claims.

    I can’t help that you (and a lot of other people, apparently) see asking for citations, as casting doubt. Expressing doubt wasn’t my intention, I was genuinely curious about the sources.

    And if being curious about science is wrong, then I’m going crawl up under a warm blanket, with a cup of chai and a nice peer reviewed metastudy, while staying wrong.

    source

    • valentinesmith@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I honestly think that it’s totally fine to ask for citations and I also would have loved to see them. Furthermore I also really think that it was much more reasonable to ask the second person for the citation than the first one so I am in total agreement with you.

      And I do really want to clarify that I was honestly just commenting on the doomy comment of: „a reflection of our times“ Because this really just felt more like an anchor effect hypothesis moment to me of being biased by the first data input however outrageous it may seem.

      Even if you had casted doubt (which I again don’t think you did) that would’ve been fine and healthy I would argue. I love it when people ask for citations and then even read through them and discuss the limitations of it, I think that’s fucking awesomesauce and I’m glad people like you can read it and share their insights on it.

      Long story short I was sharing another - to me more plausible - explanation of the vote distribution. Hope you have a lovely day and this kerfuffle did not discourage you from exploring and sharing the interest details of the world.

      (god I should really learn to write more concise)

      source

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Thanks for clarifying. And if writing concise was an Olympic discipline, you’d be in the elite compared to me :)

        source
• Maalus@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Source? Show me the evidence and metastudy

  source