Comment on Four Dead In Fire As Tesla Doors Fail To Open After Crash
deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
Elmo is too cheap to give his customers real door handles when it can be done in software.
Comment on Four Dead In Fire As Tesla Doors Fail To Open After Crash
deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
Elmo is too cheap to give his customers real door handles when it can be done in software.
jdeath@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
it aint just tesla. i was at a wedding this week and one of my pals rented an electric Ford. no regular door handles, no buttons. we ended up roasting it the whole time. the future is now! he paid $40 to get 200 miles of charge and it only took 90 minutes. all the buttons were screens and the levers were buttons or knobs! seriously stupid
megopie@beehaw.org 4 weeks ago
The touch pad control shit just sends me “yah, let’s get rid of these cheap, easily manufactured and implemented dials and knobs that can be easily operated without looking and replace them with an expensive touch screen that you need to look away from the road to use, that’s truly the way of the future; Unnecessarily expensive, more difficult to use, and reliant on software that will probably get bricked in 3 years when the executives lay off the team maintaining it so they can give them selves a pay raise.”
jdeath@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
also, the disrespect for software that powers the fucking touchscreen is insane (as a non-biased software developer)
megopie@beehaw.org 4 weeks ago
It often feels like the software is an afterthought and not given the time and resources it needs to work properly. Like, they slap the screen in to seem tech forward or to stream line dash design, and then dump the problems this creates on to software devs.
dgriffith@aussie.zone 4 weeks ago
You’ve got the motive back to front.
In modern cars those buttons are an input to a body computer which then sends commands over the vehicle data bus to another module that performs the appropriate function. The touchscreen option is much cheaper once you have more than a few buttons to deal with.
Buttons have different physical shapes, the little decal for the button on each one has to be printed and put on top, each one needs to be connected to power, each one needs to be slotted into the dash somewhere , each one needs to be backlit so you can use it at night, and the signal for each one has to be routed somewhere through increasingly bulky harnesses, etc etc.
A touchscreen sits on the vehicle data bus and with a bit of software, sends whatever command is needed.
Is it a great user experience to press fiddly buttons on a touchscreen while driving down a bumpy road? Fuck no. But it is definitely cheaper and less complicated for the manufacturer.
megopie@beehaw.org 4 weeks ago
A touch screen is more expensive than an injection molded plastic knob, even if the actual interfacing of the controls is easier.
I take the point that it’s simpler to integrate with how many buttons, dials and controls newer cars have, but I think the proliferation of those bits is part of the same issue. A lot of stuff is being added not because people find use in these things but because companies feel they need to add them to appear like they’re tech forward.
jdeath@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
the part that worries me is that planes with touchscreens are coming