Comment on Swords suck, spears are a way more effective weapon
Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com 2 days agoSo you’re saying, once you lose your advantage you gain a disadvantage? This the kind of religious propaganda that put Atreides on the throne
Comment on Swords suck, spears are a way more effective weapon
Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com 2 days agoSo you’re saying, once you lose your advantage you gain a disadvantage? This the kind of religious propaganda that put Atreides on the throne
BlazarNGC@lemm.ee 2 days ago
I’m just saying you better be hot fire with that spear. Otherwise you’re getting cut.
dwindling7373@feddit.it 1 day ago
Absolutely not. It’s the other way around there’s a reason any army get spears while swords are just a simbol for nobility.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 19 hours ago
I always find it fascinating the kind of things people will say because they saw a YouTube video once while ignoring all the actual historical context, like the Romans building their empire by fighting spear phalanxes with sword (and javelin) based legions.
dwindling7373@feddit.it 19 hours ago
The Romans swords were not actual swords.
They also had shields and that changes things a lot.
prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
That reason is price to produce and skill to wield my dude
dwindling7373@feddit.it 1 day ago
I’m not an expert, are you? All the in dephts historical weapon stuff I met in my life has told me and confirmed me spears win against swords.
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 days ago
At close range the spear becomes a staff which can block the knife and give a concussion thwack.