You only get a short time with the pointy end of the spear and then once a sword wielder is inside your range, you’ve got an unwieldy stick and they have a sword. Good for stand off melee maybe but prob not.
Yes, but getting in close without getting stabbed is really hard.
Here’s an actual example of modern HEMA folks giving it a lot of goes:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLLv8E2pWdk
Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com 2 days ago
So you’re saying, once you lose your advantage you gain a disadvantage? This the kind of religious propaganda that put Atreides on the throne
BlazarNGC@lemm.ee 2 days ago
I’m just saying you better be hot fire with that spear. Otherwise you’re getting cut.
dwindling7373@feddit.it 2 days ago
Absolutely not. It’s the other way around there’s a reason any army get spears while swords are just a simbol for nobility.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 22 hours ago
I always find it fascinating the kind of things people will say because they saw a YouTube video once while ignoring all the actual historical context, like the Romans building their empire by fighting spear phalanxes with sword (and javelin) based legions.
prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
That reason is price to produce and skill to wield my dude
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 days ago
At close range the spear becomes a staff which can block the knife and give a concussion thwack.