Comment on The doctor then had to go and treat that lawyer for being a burn victim
FelixCress@lemmy.world 5 days agoMost of the people who lost, lost because they were being sarcastic.
What a complete and utter rubbish.
Comment on The doctor then had to go and treat that lawyer for being a burn victim
FelixCress@lemmy.world 5 days agoMost of the people who lost, lost because they were being sarcastic.
What a complete and utter rubbish.
Xanthrax@lemmy.world 5 days ago
That was my experience. You also have to remember I I was in civil court.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 5 days ago
You made a general statement that MOST of people lost their cases just because they were sarcastic. This is utter tosh.
Judges may not like sarcasm, no argument here. But to say that most people lost due to sarcasm is a complete nonsense.
Xanthrax@lemmy.world 5 days ago
That is what I said, yes. I had to sit through everyone else’s cases. If they were rude, they lost. Most of them that lost were rude.
spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 days ago
There should be a counterpart to “copaganda” for legal shows and media that depict the court as a pristine, high-stakes, yet ultimately fair process. It’s intriguing to witness people’s initial confrontations with corruption in this context—I understand their defensiveness, as the introduction of cognitive dissonance can be super uncomfortable.
On another note, it’s disheartening to consider how what you experienced likely contributes to the disproportionate legal contempt faced by POC compared to white individuals. Perceptions of rudeness vary widely across cultures, which can definitely influence systemic racism in the legal system.
FelixCress@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Yup, let’s double down on your nonsense 🙄