Comment on Starfield players pirate the DLSS mod after the developer locks it behind paywall
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 year agoDLSS 3 is far worse than DLSS 2 IMO.
There’s basically zero disadvantage to turning on DLSS 2. Must of the time you cannot or can barely tell the difference.
DLSS 3 introduces lots of artifacting, some frames straight up look like DALL-E image, it adds input lag, and it needs you to already have a high framerate to start with to make it bearable, text in particular gets mangled by it.
Fast paced games and games that rely on quick reactions are a no-go for DLSS 3. It’s suitable for games like MS flight sim where adding input lag doesn’t really matter and there’s not rapid movement.
Psythik@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Knock it off with the fake news. My TV artifacts more than my 4090 when converting 24Hz films to 60/120. You can’t even notice any artifacting in DLSS 3 without taking screenshots and pixel-peeping. Quit talking out of your ass.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If you think you can’t see any artifacting with DLSS 3 then you are crazy.
pory@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You’re arguing about visual fidelity with someone who uses their TV to “turn 24hz movies to 120fps”. It’s the equivalent of the guy who got into a heated debate over Italian food with a Redditor that also posted about drinking his own piss on /r/piss.
Psythik@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yes, because comparing apples to oranges is the same thing as drinking your own piss. Get real, my dude.