This has the issue of always assuming a household will always live in the most space efficient way possible (2 adults in 1 bedroom with no children or others).
Assume you need 2 bedrooms (2 adults and 1 child): A 1,000 sq ft home in the USA is somewhere close to the 10th percentile in terms of size, so going down to 750 sq ft puts you near the absolute smallest 2 bedroom houses available.
MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I mean, I’m not going to ask you to doxx yourself, but I’m extremely curious to know where you’re seeing these homes that are, as you describe them, like 150 SqFt of livable area with an attached 3 car garage.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 year ago
I’m in a somewhat rural part of the central valley in California. Lotta dairy farms out here, and they have their own living spaces for the workers that are just absolute shitholes.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think you’re an unreasonable exception
jadegear@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Plenty of homes in rural NE that (while not as small as this) are still well within the 60% mark for garage ratio. They tend to double as workshops or large enough space for farm vehicle maintenance.
Considering the amount of rural settlements and farmlands / ranches around the US, I’d say it’s not necessarily unreasonable. Can even find them in suburbia, albeit more rarely (have in-laws with the living space lofted over a full garage, which would put it at ~50% minimum before accounting for interior walls.)
Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’ve seen workers quarters like this in farms, oil fields, rural power plants etc. They’re usually supposed to be for temporary or seasonal workers. Just a simple sleeping area + room for vehicles to drive to the jobsite.