Comment

Comment on Not likely to be AI-generated or Deepfake

When I look at the HSL of those colors I get 60, 54 and 46 (ignoring the ocean one cause I just don’t have that open anymore) for the S (saturation) value.

Like I said it’s weird that we are getting different values cause your brightness also wasn’t in line with what I had. And that wouldn’t be a screen issue.

My red came in at 73% for me.

source

Sort:hotnew top

vithigar@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Odd. I tag your red at 78%. And for what it’s worth this RGB to HSV converter agrees with that number taking your colour hex as C92D20. I certainly don’t know enough about it to offer an explanation as to why it might be different.

source
- Krauerking@lemy.lol ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  I am importing mine into a photo editor so might be something with that. Anyways.
  
  Thanks for the examples. It gave me something to think about and the discussion has been interesting. I think there may be details to take away from this but I’m not in a rush to dip back into AI images.
  
  source
  - vithigar@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    For what it’s worth I agree that AI images will generally have “tells” that give away their nature. It’s just they aren’t quite so straightforward as being able to check that average values are within a range. It would be nice if it were that easy though.
    
    While I do dabble with AI image generation I’m not a lunatic who calls themself an “artist” for doing so, nor do I think being a “prompt engineer” is any kind of expression of creativity or skill. I think the people who do are completely self-deluded.
    
    source