lol. so naive.
Comment on [deleted]
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 months agoBecause they’re shitty people and threaten intimidation are the only way they would win. We don’t do the same thing, because we are better than them. Stooping to their level would make us just as bad.
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 3 months ago
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It’s not naïvety, it’s something called integrity.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 months ago
Oh, is that what best 40’s fascism?
I thought it was the power of incredible violence.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Except we didn’t have to genocide 15 million people in order to get that result.
And you’re assuming both sides are the same, which they very clearly are not.
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 3 months ago
let me know how that integrity works out when your face is under their boot.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Better than turning into one of them
Wilzax@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.
If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Both sides are not the same, therefore your logical equation is flawed.
A!=B
Wilzax@lemmy.world 3 months ago
The operating word here is “Would”. This is a hypothetical.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Whether or not it hypothetical is irrelevant. Your logic is flawed, so therefore, so is your conclusion.