lol. so naive.
Comment on [deleted]
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 10 months agoBecause they’re shitty people and threaten intimidation are the only way they would win. We don’t do the same thing, because we are better than them. Stooping to their level would make us just as bad.
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It’s not naïvety, it’s something called integrity.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 months ago
Oh, is that what best 40’s fascism?
I thought it was the power of incredible violence.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Except we didn’t have to genocide 15 million people in order to get that result.
And you’re assuming both sides are the same, which they very clearly are not.
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
let me know how that integrity works out when your face is under their boot.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Better than turning into one of them
Wilzax@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.
If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Both sides are not the same, therefore your logical equation is flawed.
A!=B
Wilzax@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The operating word here is “Would”. This is a hypothetical.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Whether or not it hypothetical is irrelevant. Your logic is flawed, so therefore, so is your conclusion.