Comment on [deleted]
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 3 weeks agogood! but still, why do they get to be the ones who do all the intimidation? i think it’s time we made them scared.
Comment on [deleted]
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 3 weeks agogood! but still, why do they get to be the ones who do all the intimidation? i think it’s time we made them scared.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Because they’re shitty people and threaten intimidation are the only way they would win. We don’t do the same thing, because we are better than them. Stooping to their level would make us just as bad.
Wilzax@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.
If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Both sides are not the same, therefore your logical equation is flawed.
A!=B
Wilzax@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The operating word here is “Would”. This is a hypothetical.
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
lol. so naive.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s not naïvety, it’s something called integrity.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 weeks ago
Oh, is that what best 40’s fascism?
I thought it was the power of incredible violence.
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
let me know how that integrity works out when your face is under their boot.