Comment on [deleted]
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 1 year agogood! but still, why do they get to be the ones who do all the intimidation? i think it’s time we made them scared.
Comment on [deleted]
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 1 year agogood! but still, why do they get to be the ones who do all the intimidation? i think it’s time we made them scared.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Because they’re shitty people and threaten intimidation are the only way they would win. We don’t do the same thing, because we are better than them. Stooping to their level would make us just as bad.
Wilzax@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.
If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Both sides are not the same, therefore your logical equation is flawed.
A!=B
Wilzax@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The operating word here is “Would”. This is a hypothetical.
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
lol. so naive.
EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s not naïvety, it’s something called integrity.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 year ago
Oh, is that what best 40’s fascism?
I thought it was the power of incredible violence.
cowardsgfy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
let me know how that integrity works out when your face is under their boot.