Comment on Nostalgia and remake culture

• Warl0k3@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  You’ve a winning argument, to be sure! Not sure where I quantified how much I think hollywood influences culture but okay.

  FWIW, obviously popular media both is influential and responds to culture. “Hollywood” really shouldn’t be treated as a singular entity if we’re trying for a semblance of legitimacy. This is really quickly going to fall into a discussion of the role of the audience and how that’s changed in the digital era (vs. when Aristotle first brought it up…), and neither of us care enough to suffer through thay. Suffice to say it’s not cut and dry, and beyond that I dont know any better than you do what specific impact they have (and neither do they).

  source
• emuspawn@orbiting.observer ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Is defining culture the same as advancing culture?

  source

  • orrk@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    fuck is “advancing culture” exactly? honest question, because the idea of culture advancing is a farce, it changes yes, but advancing is some constructionist idea that always draws from some authoritarian colonialist bullshit, example, the “advanced European culture” vs “the primitive non-Europeans”

    source

    • emuspawn@orbiting.observer ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That’s a pretty good question. I 💯 agree that it can fall into authoritarian colonial bullshit, and in fact that’s probably what I was thinking of in terms of ‘defining’ vs ‘advancing’. I’ll invoke the case of the ‘Sad Puppies’, a bunch of lame ass white men who were super mad that the Hugos were overwhelmingly going to ‘not white men’ (read: interesting BIPOC voices everyone loves and gasp…women?!).

      I would probably claim the Sad Puppies tried to define culture.

      The rest of the attendees advanced it by telling them to fuck right off.

      source