this was more a result of them biting off more than they can chew than an actual lack of skill
obsidian seemed like it had a hard time letting go of grand plans even when they proved to be unworkable
Comment on [MEGATHREAD] Starfield - Your experiences!
AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 year agoObsidian are great at sorry but also iffy at game Dev. NV was standard AAA bug fest.
this was more a result of them biting off more than they can chew than an actual lack of skill
obsidian seemed like it had a hard time letting go of grand plans even when they proved to be unworkable
Still love it, maybe because it feels like they cared about making a good game. I still load up NV on occasion.
I do a play through of all the FO games every couple of years too.
cmhe@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That seems a bit unfair to Obsidian. They were given an engine, they where unfamiliar with and had a very short 18 months of development time, very likely because of their deal with Bethesda.
Lols@lemm.ee 1 year ago
i mean it explicitly was the deal they made with bethesda, they both agreed to a deadline
the lack of focus on actual bug fixes and the overconfidence with how much content they could realistically finish in those 18 months was still absolutely on obsidian
AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The other person made a good point but QA before release is important and lots of bugs were dead obvious in all the games.