Tecnically I agreed to “playstation…”
Comment on The HELLDIVERS™^©®^³ 2 EULA is a URL
cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
a good lawyer could probably argue that a user isn’t bound to that eula.
heck a bad lawyer could probably too.
pewpew@feddit.it 1 month ago
Lobreeze@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Are any users actually bound, ever?
basmatii@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Depends on how paid off the judge is in the lawsuit.
merc@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
They’re bound to the EULA, but the EULA is meaningless because it’s just a URL. They’re definitely not bound by whatever’s at that URL.
This would be like having someone sign a contract when the contract was just a shopping list. Sure, they’re bound by the “contract”, but the contract doesn’t specify anything they can or can’t do.
AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And the URL text can be changed at any time
merc@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
It could be changed at any time, it might not resolve properly, the page could be hijacked, an ad blocker could decide it’s an ad and show something else instead…
AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And if the page is set to no index and no robots, the only record of any change would be client side only
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Why does this remind me of The Phantom Tollbooth?