It can only go right because corporations must be punished for trying to replace people with machines.
Comment on Dreams come true
Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month agoJust use the llm to make the books that the llm then uses, what could go wrong?
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 1 month ago
runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Someone’s probably already coined the term, but I’m going to call it LLM inbreeding.
Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I suggested this term in academic circles, as a joke.
I also suggested hallucinations ~3-6 years ago only to find out it was ALSO suggested in the 1970s.
Inbreeding, lol
anzo@programming.dev 1 month ago
There was some research article applying this 70s computer science concept to LLMs. It was published in Nature and hit major news outlets. Basically they further trained GPT on its output for a couple generations, until the model degraded terribly. Sounded obvious to me, but seeing it happen on the www is painful nonetheless…
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
The real term is synthetic data
itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
but it amounts to about the same
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
sort of
Benn@lemm.ee 1 month ago
It’s quite similar to another situation known as data incest
thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Soylent AI? Auto-infocannibalism