I feel like you’re looking at it wrong: If you imagine a community to be a town square, then every comment is someone standing on a soap box shouting into the crowd. The mods are the police standing on the side lines.
In this scenario, as long as no one says anything illegal (or against the community’s rules), the police should just stand there and keep watch. If the whole crowd starts booing the person shouting on their soap box, it would clearly be wrong for the police to silence this person or to remove them from the town square. They should be allowed to be there and say whatever they want, just as you should be allowed to voice your opinion on what they’re saying.
Saying something that people don’t like hearing should never be a reason to silence someone by itself. There are valid reasons to “silence” ( you know, remove a comment or ban them) someone, but "I (we) don’t like what they’re saying can never be a reason to do so.
qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
“mod doesn’t like the post” doesn’t always mean “mod removes post.”
dope@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Mod never examining post means that the mod won’t remove the post. Mod examining the post means that the mod might remove the post. Thus downvotes increase the likelihood of removal by catching the mod’s attention that way.