You say that, but Immortals of Aveum probably would have benefited immensely from a 30 FPS option.
Comment on Starfield Launch Details, PC Specs & More
PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Is it still 30 fps on Series X? I don’t think that’s acceptable for a first-person game in 2023.
beefcat@lemmy.world 10 months ago
lustrum@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Even more from a 40FPS option.
PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 10 months ago
I didn’t follow this game. Can you explain why a lower frame rate is desirable here? Is it just too demanding to run at 60+?
beefcat@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It is the first shipping UE5 game that uses both Nanite and Lumen, and with insanely detailed environments to boot. It holds a pretty stable 60 FPS on the PS5, but it runs at 720p internally and upscales to 4k using FSR2, resulting in some very questionable image quality.
I think these features are insanely cool and their commitment to supporting 60 FPS is commendable, but this really is a case where I would actually prefer 30 or 40 FPS with better visuals.
lustrum@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
It’s 720p on PS5 then upscaled. It runs ok at 60FPS. But the Res is simply too low for me
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
It’s not going to get better unless companies start making consoles with 1-2 year life cycles (which won’t sell, because at that point, you may as well be swapping parts out of your PC of Theseus).
Callie@pawb.social 10 months ago
Or they stop pushing for high graphical fidelity and ultra realism
circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
And that’s why some go with Nintendo
NuPNuA@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Why? If the game has been targetted at 30 though development and everything built around that it should be fine.
PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 10 months ago
You really believe that? Have you played New Vegas at 30 and 60 fps? Go ahead and try it out. I’ll wait.