Comment on Lawless society

• NatakuNox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Rules are enforced by the collective not by a small minority essentially. Things like direct democracy doesn’t contradict with their philosophy. Essentially middle management and above in all aspects of financial and political life would be abolished.

  source

  • june@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Direct democracy doesn’t only not contradict with anarchism, it is a core tenant of anarchism. After all, how do we get rid of unjustified hierarchy without creating a hierarchy free form or rulership?

    source

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      There is a whole debate within anarchism whether to use the term democracy or not. People on both sides of this semantical debate will have identical utopias but call them differently. Zoe Baker has a video essay about that on YouTube.

      I like the term Direct Democracy since it shows my disagreement with parliamentary democracy while still using a term that’s regarded as positive. “Our democracy isn’t direct enough” will resonate with more people than “Democracy bad, anarchy good”.

      source
    • contrapunctus@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      core * tenet

      source

      • june@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Thanks

        source
• Forester@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  What Monopoly on violence

  source