Comment on Who knew 1989 was an uneventful year in China

• wanderingmagus@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  They didn’t say the USSR, they said modern day China and Russia

  source

  • archomrade@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    See, this is exactly what I mean by “I understand them so little that they must be the opposition in disguise”

    If you tried at all, youd understand that they’re position on “modern day Russia and China” is based on the idea of critical support. They evaluate policy decisions against “does this bring the working class closer to solidarity or not”.

    I.e. on the Ukraine war, their position is basically “U.S. Involvement in any war is a net-negative to worker solidarity in the country of question”. None there support Russia’s invasion, but they think Americas involvement spells the end of any socialist coalition to begin with.

    But again, “I understand them so little they must be a part of the opposition”. They have a different (definitively leftist) understanding of the war than you do. Doesn’t make them right-wing.

    source

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Stop sucking off Winnie.

      source

      • archomrade@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Lol

        source
    • FaeDrifter@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They evaluate policy decisions against “does this bring the working class closer to solidarity or not”.

      When it comes to Russia bombing their cities and raping their women and children, is that positively or negatively influencing working class solidarity?

      source

      • archomrade@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Negatively.

        When it comes to supplying lethal aid to Ukraine to continue the war, though, they’d also say negatively.

        For the record I don’t agree, but that is their position and I understand it.

        source

        • -> View More Comments