archomrade
@archomrade@midwest.social
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
I’m not much for word games, thanks.
- Comment on Post-election blues 1 week ago:
not protest, that doesn’t work
Civil disobedience works too.
- Comment on Post-election blues 1 week ago:
If all you do is vote then you’re a big part of the problem.
- Comment on Post-election blues 1 week ago:
And this is why libs are made fun of for their feckless electoralism.
Try organizing and building mutual aid networks instead of just sitting on your ass and watching.
Maybe in 4 years you’ll be better prepared.
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
I just want to hear you say that votes cast not for your party aren’t legitimate votes
Never what I said, nor intended
voting for a 3rd party doesn’t count
Whoomp, there it is.
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
I just want to hear you say that votes cast not for your party aren’t legitimate votes
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
I voted third party.
Read it again.
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
So did OP.
- Comment on Serious statement: I don't understand the argument that not voting for Harris was the morally correct thing to do, because of Gaza. Why does anyone believe this? 1 week ago:
It worked for some democratic voters, but not for the 14 million others.
- Comment on True Story 1 week ago:
Because that explanation makes them feel better
- Comment on Rested 3 weeks ago:
I was just asleep for three and I do not feel well rested.
- Comment on Why are peole hating on .world? 5 weeks ago:
Lol
- Comment on Thanks, Logan. 5 weeks ago:
Mother nature will be like ‘sloooooowwwwww dowwwwwwwn’, and you’ll say “FUCK YOU” and kick her in the face with your
ENERGY LEGS
- Comment on Thanks, Logan. 5 weeks ago:
I was just making that joke
- Comment on Thanks, Logan. 5 weeks ago:
Prime’s got what plants crave - it’s got electrolytes
- Comment on Thanks, Logan. 5 weeks ago:
There’s a caffeinated version of it and a ‘electrolyte’ version, afaik
- Comment on Missed Connection 1 month ago:
Lmao Iowa City might be the funniest place for someone to own a cybertruck
- Comment on There you go little guy 1 month ago:
It’s less a problem with racial profiling and more a problem with it being a poverty-tax.
Enforcing a flat-rate fee structure with speed cameras disproportionately hurts low-income drivers (who are already economically unstable), and allocating state/city funding toward road maintenance instead of public transit infrastructure pushes people into a loop of auto costs-> traffic fines -> loss of work -> more financial insecurity, ect.
True enough: reducing officer interactions is a good thing, but those cops end up spending that saved time escalating other non-violent interactions instead. If that’s your goal, you should be de-funding and reforming law enforcement, not automating fine collection.
- Comment on There you go little guy 1 month ago:
Lemmy try not to post crimes challenge - impossible. Granted, as far as crimes go, this one seems innocuous enough, but still.
I’ve been told repeatedly on c/piracy that lemmy is just too small to attract the attention of law enforcement and three-letter agencies
Paradoxically, I’ve also been told that lemmy is rife with state-sponsored troll farms, so…?
- Comment on There you go little guy 1 month ago:
You know what else would reduce police forces? Eliminating car traffic entirely.
Cops spend the most time on ordinary traffic stops.
- Comment on jealousy 1 month ago:
Because apparently some of us only eat peanut butter and never chew anything solid
- Comment on Is it me or is everyone in hexbear insane? 2 months ago:
Browsing their coms can be a pretty unique experience, especially if you go in with a preformed idea of what their communities are like. There’s a huge spread of interests and experiences, and sometimes you can be browsing a niche community and forget that these were the people posting BPB on lemmy.world threads a year ago.
Knowing the academic writings and history they’re referencing helps a lot with understanding where they are coming from, even if you may not agree with all of it.
- Comment on Is it me or is everyone in hexbear insane? 2 months ago:
This is the most reasonable response.
A lot of people here have long since made up their mind about hexbear based both on repeated meta posting on the topic and possibly a bad experience or two with them on a topic they assumed was uncontested but is a landmine topic for communists of a particular bent
I’ve personally never had a bad experience with hexbears, possibly because I’m more empathetic to their perspective, but more likely because I know when it’s time to disengage. There are users on lemmy who feel strongly about a certain topic that’s abrasive to hexbear users and dig in their heels when jeered at (or maybe feel a personal responsibility to stand them down) and are usually the users here who have the most complaints, because the standard reaction from hexbear users is irreverence (both the users and the mods).
Unlike a lot of liberals coming from reddit, communists often don’t have delusions about the neutrality of moderation and so they’ll ban you on a whim if they think you’re there to stir shit. They use the ban hammer judiciously even with users on their own instance. That’s often the biggest complaint both with hexbear and with lemmy.ml.
- Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone 2 months ago:
We can’t have a discussion at all if we’re not allowed to address the statements and intent of the other.
stop making it personal.
I’d kindly ask you to stop making it about the things I’m doing. You’re making it personal.
- Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone 2 months ago:
It’s actually not speaking the personal costs born by consumers, it’s talking about the cost of purchasing food for the diet.
As I said, if the paper was discussing the systemic hurtles and personal choices of consumers it would be a different paper, saying a different thing.
- Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone 2 months ago:
How can I leave you out of an analysis that is about something you said? You’re just being ridiculous now.
- Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone 2 months ago:
What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.”
Which is factually supported by the study, even if you’d prefer to interpret it to mean something else
- Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone 2 months ago:
I’m not trying to make this about you, i’m just trying to respond to what I think you’re trying to argue that you didn’t explicitly say
- Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone 2 months ago:
i don’t really know
YES, now you’re getting it
- Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone 2 months ago:
The paper wasn’t discussing food stamp programs or even what food you might already have