Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone

• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  This is a semantic argument that ignores reality

  no, it’s not. but this is a thought terminating cliche

  source

  • naught@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You are literally arguing the definition of the word “cruelty” rather than dealing with the substance. I appreciate the engagement, but this is where I’ll stop. I hope you consider the conflicts in your worldview and work toward improving the world for yourself and the beings that inhabit it.

    source

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I hope you consider the conflicts in your worldview and work toward improving the world for yourself and the beings that inhabit it.

      YOU, TOO

      source
    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      if cruelty is what is wrong, we must agree on a definition.

      source
• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  what is the bar for necessity? you are introducing an ambiguity here.

  source

  • naught@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You do not need meat to survive

    source

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      you don’t know what I need

      source
    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      why should survival be the bar?

      source