Comment on Maybe this is better for everyone

• naught@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This is a strawman. No one is arguing buying beans fixes deforestation. However, if less meat is produced (ie less animals are raised for slaughter), then less deforestation will come as a result of the meat industry. If legume farming was destroying the rainforest, I’d have a problem with that too

  source

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    If legume farming was destroying the rainforest,

    turns out, a lot of the the deforested amazon is being used to grow soy.

    source

    • naught@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This was the case, and is certainly problematic. Take it a step further – who or what is consuming that soy? Animal agriculture, by and large. Therefore this is an argument for veganism, or at least reducing consumption.

      greenpeace.org/…/amazon-rainforest-deforestation-…

      source

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        the vast majority of the world’s soy (about 85%) is pressed for oil in an oil press for human use. the byproduct of the press is called soy meal or soy cake, and would be a waste product if we didn’t find a use for it. currently, almost all of it goes to feed livestock, (about 70% of the entire crop-weight).

        soybeans are used by people, and we feed the trash to livestock.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    if less meat is produced (ie less animals are raised for slaughter), then less deforestation will come as a result of the meat industry.

    but just being vegan doesn’t cause this to happen.

    source

    • naught@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s simple economics. Less demand, less supply.

      source

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        that’s not causal.

        source