Comment on Disney creates best argument for piracy in a century.

lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Badeendje@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Nah, my country just does not allow these kinds of clauses. You know… like a sane country does.

  source

  • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The government that I pay taxes to doesn’t allow this sort of abusive clause either. However, this is a lot like Nestlé’s slavery chocolate: it’s still harming someone in the world, and the business is showing signs that it would gladly do it against us if allowed to do so.

    source

    • Badeendje@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yep, government needs to regulate businesses.

      But in this particular case I would suggest the judge “asks” whoever signed off on this lawsuit to come to court and sentence that person and the lawyer to 60 days hard labor, just for thinking of the heinous use of this clause.

      Besides that, clauses that extend beyond the duration of a contract should also be heavily regulated.

      source
• leftzero@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  kept their Disney+ subscription

  No, no, the problem is that once you’ve had a Disney+ subscription, even a free trial, you’re fucked for life (and beyond), according to Disney. You (and probably any descendants you might ever have) are restricted to arbitration for ever. Cancelling the subscription at this point won’t help, you’re already doomed.

  The only ones who can save themselves are people who’ve never had a subscription (and to be safe I’d stay away from anyone who’s ever had one, just in case Disney somehow managed to make the contract contagious).

  (Of course you can still cancel on moral grounds if you’re already infected, but given the precedent Musk is trying to set with advertisers who quit Xitter, Disney will probably be able to forcibly arbitrate you into subscribing again. You and your descendants are Disney serfs now, for ever and ever.)

  source

  • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    No, no, the problem is that once you’ve had a Disney+ subscription, even a free trial, you’re fucked for life (and beyond), according to Disney.

    That’s correct on pragmatic grounds. I’m talking about moral grounds - if you’re giving them money you’re basically condoning their murder.

    source

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yeah, the question is how long until they make it illegal to quit. As I said Musk is already trying, with advertisers.

      source

      • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        At those times I’m glad that Musk is a muppet and that his “they’re violating anrichrust!” will likely not roll well in courts, since he has a previous backstory of pissing off advertisers. And accordingly I don’t think that Disney will be able to enforce their “ackshyually they cannot sue me lol lmao see Disney+ clause” redditism. (And they likely wouldn’t be able to make contracts “valid for an eternity”, i.e. illegal to quit.)

        But I get you. They’re still trying to violate human agency for profit. And I think that legal systems around the world should be curbing down those very attempts, not just telling them “no, you can’t do this” but also “your company is acting on bad faith and should be prevented from conducting businesses under the jurisdiction of this government”.

        source
  • Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Great then that I have been pirating content ever since I remember.

    source
• figaro@lemdro.id ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  anyone who has seen the news on this and kept their Disney+ subscription should be, for moral purposes, treated as someone who condones murder

  Bro, not gonna lie, this is a bad take. My grandparents just want to watch their soap operas, my parents really like star wars.

  It’s like global warming. Blaming individuals for not recycling is not the move - taking action against huge corporations is the only realistic way to make change. By blaming random people, we end up looking like crazy people.

  source

  • lvxferre@mander.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I get that your [grand]parents want to watch their stuff. Just like I want to eat chocolate*, even if it’s associated with child slavery in West Africa. But I don’t think that someone’s enjoyment should come at the price of ruining others’ lives.

    And sadly, that’s exactly what happens here. Our conscious decisions to accept products and services from businesses that grossly disregard human life and dignity - like Disney and Nestlé - make us condoners. People who are still willing to pay for either have blood on their hands, like it or not.

    We have other options. In your case, good ol’ piracy would let them have their fun without feeding the company.

    It’s like global warming. Blaming individuals for not recycling is not the move - taking action against huge corporations is the only realistic way to make change. By blaming random people, we end up looking like crazy people.

    I don’t think that we [people in general] should fall for a dichotomy like “either blame the company, or the individuals consuming their shit”. While the blame for the individuals is considerably lower, they still have some blame - for feeding the company. We should be fighting in both fronts.

    *I’m comparing the situation with chocolate because IDGAF about Disney but I care a lot about food, so it’s easier for me to put myself in the shoes of your family this way.

    source
• primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  not just murder, but the murder of specifically their own loved ones, someone having a disney+ (or any) subscription is basically an announcement that they’re a fucking psychopath, or otherwise have nobody they love.

  source