Comment on Dallas Black Dance Theatre fired its entire company of dancers, after they unionized

TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• seathru@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It is per the National Labor Relations Act. It’s up to the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) to enforce it and they typically don’t fuck around.

  source

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Is it illegal? My understanding was that the union means the employers only option to terminate was to indiscriminately terminate them all. It’s possible that it’s illegal to terminate them for the act of unionising, if that’s what you mean though

    source

    • kn33@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      My understanding is that the only legal way to fire them for unionizing is to put on a charade of completely shutting down the business, and maintaining that closure for long enough to convince a court, before opening a “new” business.

      source
    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It is illegal to retaliate against workers for organizing or joining a union. Texas is an at-will employment state, which means it is legal to fire everyone for any reason that isn’t explicitly illegal (like sex- or race-based discrimination, or retaliation against union organizers) or even no reason at all.

      So the dance company can fire everyone because it was Friday and the sky was blue, and it is not illegal. But they have said that all of the dancers violated some internal conduct policy, so a court will evaluate the policy and determine whether or not they were fired for an illegal reason.

      source

      • catloaf@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        And firing people who just unionized is really fucking suspicious. You’re gonna need a real good explanation for it, because the NLRB tends to look very poorly upon it.

        source
      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Texas is an at-will employment state

        I hate these kinds of statements. People use them all the time while meaning “well THIS state has at-will employment, so special rules apply.” as if it’s some unique feature of that particular state.

        It isn’t. 49 out of 50 states have at-will employment. That makes it the norm in the US. They don’t have special rules, they just have the default rules. Only Montana has special rules because it’s the only state that ISN’T at-will.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Etterra@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I live in an at-will state (IL). And it’s such fucking bullshit. I didn’t even know why it’s a law here.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I just assumed the latter. I didn’t realize that wiping everyone out was a legitimate option.

      source
• Lemjukes@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It is

  source