Do we not do that anymore?
Comment on Defense
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
This is how books were written 100 years ago, you had to spend like the first third explaining why everyone else is wrong before getting to the part where you claim to be right.
TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Quacks still do, the rest doesn’t
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Some argue vaccines have benefits. What they fail to admit, however,
PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
I initially didn’t do enough of that in my PhD thesis (CS, about some weird non-frame-based imaging tech that is still only of academic interest), and my committee demanded I add more stake-claiming favorable comparisons to other tech to my introduction before I submitted.