Comment on Say it.

• Gullible@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  All of those look <18 so there might be another conversation to be had here. Especially 5, because foxes typically die of old age well before their 10th birthday. Yes, even magical foxes, science doesn’t discriminate against abominations unless it currently is.

  source

  • Rakonat@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Are you saying Japanese lore of 2000 year old fox ladies lied to me?

    source

    • Gullible@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I’m sorry to say but, much like the class gerbil, they’re replaced in secret. There can be no foxy ladies, merely fox girls. Relatedly, have you ever wondered why He’s called The Lamb?

      source

      • blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Well then lock me up because I want to Reeaaeeecbeereeeookaaaaabdhelooawooooooo those 🦊 👗 🐾 girls OwO.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    We are talking about sentient, possibly anthropomorphic foxes. Do you think science applies here?

    source

    • Gullible@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yes!

      source
• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Nah she is actually type 2

  source

  • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    But without the face she isn’t quite there yet.

    source
• Kedly@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Id say post strip scene puts her firmly at two. 1 mostly implies just the ears and tail being the change (the shit lemmy makes me say sometimes)

  source

  • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    She can’t be fully 2 without the paws and face though.

    source

    • Kedly@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      My understanding of two is its starting to pick up animal features while still looking mostly human, whereas one could affectively just be accessories added

      source