Nah she is actually type 2
Comment on Say it.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month agoI’d say you’re mostly safe since we’re not even reaching step two.
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
But without the face she isn’t quite there yet.
Kedly@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Id say post strip scene puts her firmly at two. 1 mostly implies just the ears and tail being the change (the shit lemmy makes me say sometimes)
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
She can’t be fully 2 without the paws and face though.
Kedly@lemm.ee 1 month ago
My understanding of two is its starting to pick up animal features while still looking mostly human, whereas one could affectively just be accessories added
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
All of those look <18 so there might be another conversation to be had here. Especially 5, because foxes typically die of old age well before their 10th birthday. Yes, even magical foxes, science doesn’t discriminate against abominations unless it currently is.
Rakonat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Are you saying Japanese lore of 2000 year old fox ladies lied to me?
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I’m sorry to say but, much like the class gerbil, they’re replaced in secret. There can be no foxy ladies, merely fox girls. Relatedly, have you ever wondered why He’s called The Lamb?
blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Well then lock me up because I want to Reeaaeeecbeereeeookaaaaabdhelooawooooooo those 🦊 👗 🐾 girls OwO.
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 month ago
We are talking about sentient, possibly anthropomorphic foxes. Do you think science applies here?
Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Yes!