Not yet convicted, so don’t jump to conclusions, but it’s not looking good for him.
Comment on Huw Edwards charged with making indecent images of children
jakwithoutac@feddit.uk 3 months ago
Oh ffs is anybody on TV not a paedo?!
Mex@feddit.uk 3 months ago
Emperor@feddit.uk 3 months ago
Obviously “innocent until proven guilty” but as it is for manufacturing child abuse images then they must have some pretty damning evidence.
jakwithoutac@feddit.uk 3 months ago
Normally I’d whole heartedly agree, but to be accused of anything even close to CSAM means he is likely one of:
- guilty, and not smart enough to hide it
- innocent, and incredibly stupid (considering his position in media)
- the victim of a very dark Wile E. Cayote frame up job
Guess we’ll all find out soon enough.
Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 months ago
Timmy Mallett.
Because if you were on Operation Yewtree, you’d for sure have had a look at his history. The fact that they’ve found nothing indicates the man is clean.
mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Chris Morris is presumably on some weird shit we don’t even have words for. Just a whole other wavelength.
steeznson@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Only fools and horses would believe that
Diddlydee@feddit.uk 3 months ago
Attenborough, I’d wager. That’s about the only one I’d be confident of. Probably Brian Blessed as well.
Emperor@feddit.uk 3 months ago
Tony Hart, although I hear Morph has a tell-all autobiography in the pipeline…
Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 3 months ago
I don’t want to hear anything bad about Tony Hart, Johnny Morris, Johnny Ball, or Brian Cant. Oh, or John Noakes. All the others are a bit sus though.
Emperor@feddit.uk 3 months ago
How bad is “bad” here?