Comment on If I live in a red state, would it be better to vote for rfk to take votes away from trump?
PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month agoThat’s not true. Voting third party helps get them funding and ballot access. If your vote for president won’t change anything, then vote for the most utility.
barsquid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No third party will ever be viable until FPTP is removed. No funding will change that. Source: basically every single election.
njordomir@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The funding gives them visibility though. Without third parties that people know and might vote for, there would be no additional challengers to point to when arguing for ranked choice voting or anything else. If there are no Green, Libertarian, Constitution voters, then FPTP loses a good portion of its luster.
Additionally, if enough people vote 3rd party, the big two may shift to win those voters back. We saw an interesting situation with the Libertarians and the Republicans this time around where the Libertarians weren’t going to primary a candidate against the Republican if the Republican met certain qualifications. If the Democrats lose even a percentage point to the greens in a tight race, they can possibly get that voter back by representing their interests to show that they are also green.
Having said all that, I agree that FPTP is a big problem and is strongly contributing to the toilet bowl death spiral American politics is experiencing.
PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
I was talking about benefits to vote for them. Those were non-election uses of voting third party.