Comment on How did Android's update support become so inconsistent?

TheInsane42@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

Bad control over the hardware. Android is 100% open source, but alas, not all drivers are. To be honest, it’s by design of some manufacturers (Samsung for one, Mediatek is another) to keep drivers of hardware closed source so updating the OS of your particular Android based mobile OS lags hugely behind Android.

Android gets monthly security updates, which need to be included in the OS of the phone manufacturer. Lineage has weekly builds for their code which include the monthly security updates. Phone manufacturers are only required to 'supply updates for 2y after introduction of the model (not after end of sale), which requires them to give 1 upgrade (major version).

Alas, support for the wide variety of Android phones hinges now for 100% on the effort of the custom rom developers. For example: The 2011 Samsung Galaxy S2 has an unofficial Lineage 20 (Android 13).

To many devices running the same opensource software without the requirement to make the drivers open source.

Apple is completely closed, Microsoft has it’s Windows closed with the option for hardware suppliers to supply the drivers (which need to be conform to their specs) Android is based on the Linux kernel, which would require hardware manufacturers that make drivers for the kernel to supply the drivers, but alas, as it’s not a company, no methods to enforce this is available.

When you want consistent ANdroid updates, you need to either:

  1. buy Google Pixel (Google is pretty consistent in updates)
  2. buy a nice brand that offers 5y+ guarantee (include updates)
  3. buy a device with active Lineage support (worst case, you can update the device yourself as the code is available)

source
Sort:hotnewtop