Comment on Aspirations

Norgur@fedia.io ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Well, sort of

  It does generate nonsense, but unlike Calvin the ChatGPT is generating nonsense based on nonsense sample data, so Calvin’s is still better.

  source

  • Norgur@fedia.io ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Furthermore, Calvin is well aware that he's talking nonsense.

    source

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yeah but that hardly affects the quality of the output, except for some fringe contextual cases.

      source
    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Calvin, and others like him, are the reason AI is like this.

      source

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        No

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • dactylotheca@suppo.fi ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I know hating ChatGPT is trendy, but while I think this AI boom is absolutely idiotic and LLMs aren’t suitable for a lot of the things people try to use them for, pretending that even their training data is “nonsense” is just silly

    source

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s “trendy,” if anything liking it is “trendy,” hating it is the educated stance.

      source

      • dactylotheca@suppo.fi ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Did you read anything I said past that part or did you just want to get your petulant downvote in?

        I literally fucking said there’s a lot of problems with the technology, but just blindly pretending everything about it is shit is idiotic. Fucking hell what the fuck is it with people’s inability to have a honest fucking argument

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Turun@feddit.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Unfortunately the average person prefers flowery language for some reason.

  If you tell it to be precise and short it usually works fine.

  source