Comment on Penguins ❤️
drathvedro@lemm.ee 4 months agoThe most obvious example I know of is this one. Not a thing, never was a thing, and the entire page is just folk from 196 and blahaj dunking on wikipedia. And check out the talk page where they try to pretend that the skeleton image is the best representation of said “phenomenon”, while simultaneously removing any message doubting it’s existence.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 months ago
I dunno, it doesn’t seem to overstate its case
It also uses sources such as Vice and the BBC
drathvedro@lemm.ee 4 months ago
[Citation needed]
There were definitely none that did before the wiki article was created.
The article from BBC is fluff written by a rando and is based completely off twitter circlejerk. VICE is not a reliable source as anyone can register as an author and make articles there.