Comment

Comment on [Labor senator] Fatima Payman says she's been 'exiled' and is 'reflecting on future' within Labor

naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

To add some nuance to this most people vote by party in the senate.

Look I don’t really agree with our system on so many levels and would probably come down on “we don’t actually have a democracy” overall so please don’t take this as some mewling defence of the status quo. replyguyinhale however she’s a senator and for ~~better or for~~ worse most people vote by party in the senate. The number of superior, awesome, and somewhat democratically responsible people who vote below the line is a statistical blip, apparently most of yous are happy having your vote mysteriously distributed according to back-room fellatio.

So, if I was the sort of person who might become a labor mp or support the party, I could mount a defense of their loyalty pledge thing on the basis that particularly in the senate you are being voted in as a sort of embodied vote of the labor party’s will and the party internal selection mechanism has deemed you specifically worthy of having a voice in the party room.

If that is their stance, and that is the implicit social contract of getting put on the ticket and receiving support from the party and its donor then you can sort of see where they are coming from. I have no idea if this is how most of the labor voters in her state feel or not but it’s certainly how the party does.

For me? Well I actually believe in shit like right and wrong so…

source

Sort:hotnew top

hanrahan@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Samilar thing with Lydia Thorpe when she spat the dummy and left the Greens, she now sits as an Independent in the Senate, cant see her being reelected?.

That aside N has the “waka” jumping bill )/(Maori for vlcanoe In think) where ifnyiu dintjatbits a nuekection… Differ electoral system though.

While not disagreeing with you, I vote below the line , democracy should be a serious business, so I take it seriously m

source
- naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I vote below the line also and think labor is accepting and aiding a genocide here. Hence my tongue in cheek wording about people who vote below and my less tongue in cheek wording about right and wrong being real.
  
  We can debate the merits of loyalty pledges till the cows come home but if you use them to silence people trying to stop or slow a genocide you’re actually um a nightmare clothed in human form and I hate you and want you to die 👍. The labor party can fuck themselves with a rusty chainsaw on this one, they’re wrong and history will remember them as murderers.
  
  source
  - Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Happy cake day!
    
    I’m curious, do you vote below the line because you vote in a way that has to be BTL, or just because you’re used to it from the old GVT days? Personally I’ve not done it since 2016, because for the most part I trust each party’s internal ordering of their candidates.
    
    But damn, if I were a Western Australian, and Payman were still in Labor, and she were still preselected in the 2028 election (that’s a lot of ifs), I would definitely be voting BTL just to support her. Not sure if I’d vote her 1, then Greens just as a way to provide maximal support for her bravery, or vote Greens first, then her, then the rest of Labor, in a more honest assessment of my political views (disregarding my vote for other smaller parties before and in between Greens & Labor).
    
    source
    naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    I don’t always agree with the party’s ordering. Some people I just fundamentally do not trust. I think there’s some concern with weird vote exhaustion (e.g. my 2nd is party 1st, my 1st is party 2nd, my 3rd is party I don’t want. My 1st goes to my 2nd, which doesn’t win, so my 3rd is counted and party 2nd loses by one vote) but I don’t know how likely that really is in practice and I mostly just drop horrible people and political schemers /shrug
    
    TBH I’ve basically lost faith in the Westminster system. I participate because absolutely fuck disempowering yourself to any degree but I put my energy in smaller scale stuff and trying to build community.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  It’s not quite the same thing, because she chose to become an independent, she didn’t get forced out by the Greens saying you must agree with the party line or else.
  
  I genuinely don’t know if the Greens would have done the same thing, because it didn’t come to that.
  
  source
Nath@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

To add some nuance to this most people vote by party in the senate.

I think this is more fair for senators than lower house. Senators represent their whole state, while MLAs represent their local electorate. I can see scenarios where the needs and wishes of your local electorate are not quite aligned with your party on all issues and in those situations, you should do what your electorate would wish of you.

This is a really murky issue for any senator. The YouGov polls show wider support for a Palestinian state than the Government does. But it also shows that more of us are unsure on this topic than those who support/don’t support. Which stands to reason, the region is really far away from us and we aren’t all that involved, really.

The pessimist in me dismisses much of the government’s position on the conflict as aligning with US interests. Which takes us back to Senator Payman. On this particular topic, I believe her firm position probably both is representative of a decent slice of her state as well as being a foil on the generic support of all things US from her party. Good on her.

I’m not really into party politics, so I don’t really have a stake in whether she should be ejected from her party for this. But if pressed, I’d say they’d be making a mistake to eject her over this matter. This is not a major party policy, and its position does not have wide-spread community support.

source
- naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  We are actually kinda involved, as a US protectorate (Prove me wrong pollies, prove me wrong! defy your masters. Ask the Kurds how always allying with the US works out) we tend to support their interests in the middle east, also we ship Israel weapons except we claim we don’t because apparently if I give you a trigger, a barrel, and a receiver and you have the rest I haven’t technically given you a weapon under international law 🙄. I think Australia has helped them repair some of the plains they’re using to murder children.
  
  But I do broadly agree with your analysis. I think the issue isn’t as simple as “loyalty pledge evil! mean evil labor” but also like what it’s being used for here is absolutely horrible and could most charitably be interpreted as a system backfiring and least charitably ghoulish power brokers squashing the soul out of a decent person to back warhawks.
  
  source
swayevenly@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
But isn’t Fatima arguing that she’s abiding by Labor’s pledge and the amendment her party put forth was going against that? According to your argument, wouldn’t her constituents be happy about that?

source
- naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Idk, I can’t vote for her and I don’t vote labor except once all my actual preferences are exhausted so I’m not really paying much attention to this. I don’t vote labor because they pull nonsense like this, acting like there’s some way “not being divided” over mass murder is worth a damn.
  
  If they’re talking about an IR bill or whatever then idk maybe not getting wedged makes sense but children are dying. I don’t really know how much more obvious the right side of history can get than “the side which stops children dying”.
  
  source