yeah,
skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 5 months ago
[deleted]
thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 months ago
And I use AI to determine the right brightness level for my phone screen (that was a feature added several android versions ago)
Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
I totally agree with a streamlined identification of images generated by an AI prompt. But, to label an image with “made with AI” metadata when the image is original, taken by a human, and simply used AI tools to edit is absolutely misleading and the language can create confusion. It is not fair to the individual who has created the original work without the use if generative AI. I simply propose revising the language to create distinction.
Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Where I live, is very difficult to get permits to knock down an old building and build a new one. So, builders will “renovate” by knocking down everything but a single wall and then building a new structure around it.
I can imagine people using that to get around the “made with ai” label. I just touched it up!
parody@lemmings.world 5 months ago
It’s like they’re ignoring the pixel I captured in the bottom left!
Really interesting analogy.
Also I imagine most anybody who gets a photo labeled will find a trick before making their next post. Copy the final image to a new PSD… print and scan for the less technically inclined… heh
Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I mean you can just remove the metadata of any image, so that doesn’t really matter.
deafboy@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Therefor, made with AI.
Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
Or generated with AI like midjourney, therefore, made with AI.
There a huge difference between the two, yet, no clear distinction when all lumped into the label of “made with AI”