I suspect that this has nothing to do with productivity for most companies. I’m not smart enough or really concerned enough with why CEOs are massive assholes to look into this - but I figured it has to do with other stuff like property.
If you own a building and rent out space to cafes and gyms or you charge for parking etc there’s a lot of incentives to get your little cash cows back in the building.
Wooki@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Its got nothing to do with this.
Dell are struggling financially, this is a great method to reduce workforce size with minimal cost.
9point6@lemmy.world 5 months ago
And I’m highlighting that it’s short-termist and self defeating
Companies like atlassian do what they can to make sure they don’t lose their best talent, what I linked is documented proof of that working.
Dell are trying to reduce costs by reducing the reasons an employee would want to stay.
Do you think they’re gonna lose the employees they would choose to?
No, they’re going to lose their best.
It’s pissing away productivity for no tangible benefit and doing so in a pretty permanent way—who is going to work for a company with that reputation?
It’s not just them nailing themselves into a coffin, it’s basically them pointing the nail gun at their face.
KevonLooney@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Exactly. Employees are not cookie cutter duplicates. The more productive ones always have more options, even when you treat them all the same. This is worse for the company than firing people randomly.
ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Productivity is for companies who want substance.
We only want continuous stock price increases regardless of how much it rots a company from the inside out.
That’s for someone else to carry about after I’m gone.
noxy@yiffit.net 5 months ago
Define “struggling”
Wooki@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Your existence
noxy@yiffit.net 5 months ago
has nothing to do with Dell’s financials