They don’t make “discrete jumps” as in teleportation. They exist stable in discrete energy levels, but that doesn’t imply things don’t move continuously.
Comment on Irrational
bstix@feddit.dk 4 months agoThe definition of irrational numbers is that they are the real numbers that are not rationel. So we need to look at the definition of real numbers. A real number is a number that can be used to measure a continuous dimensional quantity.
Quantum physics says that reality is not continuous. Particles make “discrete” jumps instead of moving continuously. So irrational numbers can’t exist.
wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 months ago
bstix@feddit.dk 4 months ago
ORLY?
Please take your evening off to explain to the common man how electrons are distributed without restoring to quantisation.
wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 months ago
That’s not what I said?
They’re “stable” energy states. That’s all.
wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 months ago
Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 months ago
And that they might still move continuously. Which is inaccurate (see Planck length).
kogasa@programming.dev 4 months ago
That is not a definition of the real numbers, quantum physics says no such thing, and even if it did the conclusion is wrong
bstix@feddit.dk 4 months ago
Let’s have a look.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrational_number
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics
The conclusion is wrong, i agree. That’s the joke of the meme.
kogasa@programming.dev 4 months ago
I’m fully aware of the definitions. I didn’t say the definition of irrationals was wrong. I said the definition of the reals is wrong. The statement about quantum mechanics is so vague as to be meaningless.
bstix@feddit.dk 4 months ago
Come on then, enlighten the average Joe.
Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 months ago
Quantum mechanics still have endless ratios which aren’t discrete. Especially ratios between stuff like wavelengths and more